13 found
Order:
Disambiguations
C. di Marco [6]Chrysanne Di Marco [6]Chiara Di Marco [1]
  1.  34
    Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):211-231.
  2.  7
    Rhetorical figures as argument schemes – The proleptic suite.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):233-252.
    Identifying rhetorical figures with marginal to non-existent lexico-syntactic signatures poses significant challenges for computational approaches reliant upon structural definitions or descriptions. One such figure is prolepsis ([Formula: see text]ó[Formula: see text]), which this essay charts out in some detail, addressing the challenges and the benefits of rendering such figures computationally tractable through the use of argument schemes with attention to metadiscursive or macro-discursive norms offered by pragma-dialectical traditions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3.  36
    An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures.Randy Allen Harris, Chrysanne Di Marco, Sebastian Ruan & Cliff O’Reilly - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (2):155-175.
    There is a driving need computationally to interrogate large bodies of text for a range of non-denotative meaning (e.g., to plot chains of reasoning, detect sentiment, diagnose genre, and so forth). But such meaning has always proven computationally allusive. It is often implicit, ‘hidden’ meaning, evoked by linguistic cues, stylistic arrangement, or conceptual structure – features that have hitherto been difficult for Natural Language Processing systems to recognize and use. Non-denotative textual effects are the historical concern of rhetorical studies, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  3
    Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):289-310.
    The generalised, automated reconstruction of the reasoning structures underlying persuasive communication is an enormously challenging task. While this work in argument mining is increasingly informed by the rich tradition of argumentation studies outside the computational field, the rhetorical perspective on argumentation is thus far largely ignored. To explore the application of rhetorical insights in argument mining, we conduct a pilot study on the connection between rhetorical figures and argumentation structure. Rhetorical figures are linguistic devices that perform a variety of functions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  7
    Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):267-287.
    This paper surveys ontological modeling of rhetorical concepts, developed for use in argument mining and other applications of computational rhetoric, projecting their future directions. We include ontological models of argument schemes applying Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST); the RhetFig proposal for modeling; the related RetFig Ontology of Rhetorical Figures for Serbian (developed by two of the authors); and the Lassoing Rhetoric project (developed by another of the authors). The Lassoing Rhetoric venture is interesting for its multifaceted approach to linguistic devices, prominently (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  5
    The argumentative litotes in The Analects.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):253-266.
    Litotes, often confused with meiosis and understatement, has long suffered neglect. By comparing synonymous key words in previous definitions, this essay defines litotes as “a trope in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite,” and for the first time classifies litotes into three subtypes based upon Aristotle’s study of opposition: contradictory, contrary and relative. Focusing particularly on the strong contradictory type of litotes and its realization in The Analects of Confucius, with its nearly one hundred double (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Arte e tecnica: quale rapporto?C. di Marco - 1986 - Aquinas 29 (1):167-176.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  9
    Critica e cura di sé: l'etica di Michel Foucault.Chiara Di Marco - 1999 - Milano: F. Angeli.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Filosofia dell'esistenza e cristologia. La Weltanschauung cristiana di R. Guardini.C. Di Marco - 1990 - Aquinas 33 (1):185.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. J. Patocka. L'esistenza umana come "vita nella verità".C. Di Marco - 1989 - Aquinas 32 (3):553.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Le figure del nulla: prospettive e riflessioni sul nichilismo.C. di Marco - 1987 - Aquinas 30 (3):547-557.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Tempo ed eternità. La filosofia narrante di F. Rosenzweig.C. di Marco - 1990 - Aquinas 33 (3):627-638.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. M. F. CANONICO, "L'uomo misura dell'essere? Lo Strutturalismo - La Scuola di Francoforte". [REVIEW]C. Di Marco - 1986 - Aquinas 29 (2):389.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark